Black Country Patriot: Pensioners to be Raped, Shafted and Screwed under New Labour.#links
i must say this is the best post i've seen in ages.
Friday, 5 February 2010
Thursday, 4 February 2010
I should have been a prophet !
Some time last year i wrote what i thought was just a theory,
http://otg-theonetruegod.blogspot.com/2009/09/conspiracy-theory.html
The part that i would like to point out is this :
" Have our top brass had the wool pulled over their eyes, or will our armed forces meld into the UN's Disaster Prevention Army, with a few fat and wealthy decorated Generals, all that is left of the once great British Army ? "
The proposed green paper by the Traitor bob Ainsworth is proof that my theories may have some credence (In probability theory, credence means a subjective estimate of probability, as in Bayesian probability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credence). It is now clear that the intentions of the traitors in power are,
" Outlining a Green Paper on military reform, he said "further integration" with key allies may be needed." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8494547.stm
I feel for our lads and lasses who've been duped into invading foriegn countries so that the elite can prosper. They are dieing and bleeding so that a select few can benefit, they are laying down their lives for the few not the many.
I wonder if any new recruit who is signing up for the armed forces now still swears fealty to Queen and country, or do they swear fealty to EU and the Global Elite ? Because they are not protecting my interests and my interests are this island of ours not some far away land that i have no desire or inclination to care a stuff about.
http://otg-theonetruegod.blogspot.com/2009/09/conspiracy-theory.html
The part that i would like to point out is this :
" Have our top brass had the wool pulled over their eyes, or will our armed forces meld into the UN's Disaster Prevention Army, with a few fat and wealthy decorated Generals, all that is left of the once great British Army ? "
The proposed green paper by the Traitor bob Ainsworth is proof that my theories may have some credence (In probability theory, credence means a subjective estimate of probability, as in Bayesian probability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credence). It is now clear that the intentions of the traitors in power are,
" Outlining a Green Paper on military reform, he said "further integration" with key allies may be needed." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8494547.stm
I feel for our lads and lasses who've been duped into invading foriegn countries so that the elite can prosper. They are dieing and bleeding so that a select few can benefit, they are laying down their lives for the few not the many.
I wonder if any new recruit who is signing up for the armed forces now still swears fealty to Queen and country, or do they swear fealty to EU and the Global Elite ? Because they are not protecting my interests and my interests are this island of ours not some far away land that i have no desire or inclination to care a stuff about.
Sunday, 17 January 2010
The Minimum Wage good or bad ?
Who decides on the level of the national minimum wage?
Ultimately it's the government. They receive a recommendation from the Low Pay Commission about the level of the national minimum wage, and decide on whether the recommendations should be implemented or not.
It has raised the living standards of the lowest paid, and helped close the gap between men and women's pay.
http://www.minimumwage.org.uk/news.asp
this article claims to be Unisons championing the low paid they are patting themselves on the back for getting the NMW raised by a massive 7p.
In my opinion this figure is being used by Companies all over the country to gauge what the wage is that they can compete with. I.e they can pay illegals anything upto this amount before employing the millions of unemployed who expect to be paid this amount. I know that this is illegal, but as in the Baroness Scotland fiasco checks are very rarely made and employers are not prosecuted to the letter of the law.
To introduce a minimum wage means that all the unemployed people are open to be discriminated against by all illegals looking for work, and employers seeking to get the lowest paid workforce.In fact it is probably used as a gauge all over the world to which other countries can undercut our manufacturing base.
*An example of this could be:
A UK electrician could be commanding a £20 an hour job.
A Polish Electrician can take a wage above the minimum wage say £10 an hour.
The Polish worker would be entitled to claim child benefit for any children they have, and would most likely share accomodation with 10 others sleeping in shifts etc.
The companies Employing the foreign workers can undercut the UK workers and ship in their own employees to do the jobs. This is wrong and is discriminating against the UK worker whos cost of living is higher.
* I have to confess this was a bit of info given by Bertie bert on our Paltalk discussion.
Ultimately it's the government. They receive a recommendation from the Low Pay Commission about the level of the national minimum wage, and decide on whether the recommendations should be implemented or not.
It has raised the living standards of the lowest paid, and helped close the gap between men and women's pay.
http://www.minimumwage.org.uk/news.asp
this article claims to be Unisons championing the low paid they are patting themselves on the back for getting the NMW raised by a massive 7p.
In my opinion this figure is being used by Companies all over the country to gauge what the wage is that they can compete with. I.e they can pay illegals anything upto this amount before employing the millions of unemployed who expect to be paid this amount. I know that this is illegal, but as in the Baroness Scotland fiasco checks are very rarely made and employers are not prosecuted to the letter of the law.
To introduce a minimum wage means that all the unemployed people are open to be discriminated against by all illegals looking for work, and employers seeking to get the lowest paid workforce.In fact it is probably used as a gauge all over the world to which other countries can undercut our manufacturing base.
*An example of this could be:
A UK electrician could be commanding a £20 an hour job.
A Polish Electrician can take a wage above the minimum wage say £10 an hour.
The Polish worker would be entitled to claim child benefit for any children they have, and would most likely share accomodation with 10 others sleeping in shifts etc.
The companies Employing the foreign workers can undercut the UK workers and ship in their own employees to do the jobs. This is wrong and is discriminating against the UK worker whos cost of living is higher.
* I have to confess this was a bit of info given by Bertie bert on our Paltalk discussion.
Monday, 11 January 2010
When did our Monarchy lose it's head?
When was our country deprived of Its most powerful figure, when exactly did our government politically behead our queen ?
After doing some research I think I now know.
a constitutional monarchy
In Britain, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ('A Limited Monarchy') are much older than that (see Magna Carta).
I've been wondering of late wether this situation could be reversed, i've been hoping that our future Monarchs' service with the armed forces may be an elaborate plan for him to get to know his generals, and to seek their views on the current form of government. Wether Britains shot in the arm maybe to revert to a Monarchist rule with the PM and government answerable to his will.
Has the Blueblood been watered down so much, that the peoples fate is no longer a concern for our current Royalty, will the seizing back of power ever be achievable by a single person?
I'll tell you this if he called for it I would follow.
After doing some research I think I now know.
a constitutional monarchy
In Britain, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ('A Limited Monarchy') are much older than that (see Magna Carta).
I've been wondering of late wether this situation could be reversed, i've been hoping that our future Monarchs' service with the armed forces may be an elaborate plan for him to get to know his generals, and to seek their views on the current form of government. Wether Britains shot in the arm maybe to revert to a Monarchist rule with the PM and government answerable to his will.
Has the Blueblood been watered down so much, that the peoples fate is no longer a concern for our current Royalty, will the seizing back of power ever be achievable by a single person?
I'll tell you this if he called for it I would follow.
Monday, 4 January 2010
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
manifesto jobs/healthcare/education/defence
a few thoughts....
Elderly need more care ?
Schools curriculum should be focussed on providing better ways to care for our Elderly.
This is a growing market its also an ethical and morally right thing to do, as people are living longer, more people should be employed to make their lives as comfortable as possible.
I'm not saying more ways should be made to prolong ones lifespan, because I'm sure some Elderly people feel worn out, although the moral argument here is if we make the elderly more comfortable, why wouldn't they want to live longer, but wouldn't that mean more jobs?
i'm a bit uncomfortable writing this, as in this day and age the Elderly seems to be a taboo subject probably because of the stigma associated with the word Retirement, ie time to stop going full pelt and to slow down take it easy, have some fun, although i'm sure there are plenty of young people out there who go out and have fun quite regularly.
my point is our generation work and play in equal amounts, some more some less, the people who are pensioners, have contributed to our way of life why shouldnt they be helped to live out the remainder of their lives the way most of this generation do.
People describe retirement as the beginning of the end why?
why not make retirement something to look forward too?
why not say once you get to 60 you've hit the jackpot, you can go and visit all the places you've wanted to.
in the science departments treatments and medicines will be top priority for Elderly and sick, even more opportunity for schools cirriculum .
people should have in 60 years led a full and fruitful life,
aptitude tests should be made through our entire lives, as some of us are very slow learners, and mature slower.
medicine and healthcare should be encouraged not business and finance agriculture and commerce, although the market is still there for these issues but wages should be structured so as not to favour one or the other as all these issues are important.
some people love their work and don't wish to retire, this is their option and they can review it yearly.
of course this would put the need for immigration at a minimum as people will work till 60 at reaching 60 so I'm sure they'll do their utmost, to leave behind a culture who will care the same for them.
fitness, will improve people will want to be fit at 60 so they can really start to enjoy themselves.
binge drinking and youth yobbishness will be fazed out through education and eating and health issues
a place for muscle aswell as intelligence is the army, this will be our security for achieving a fond farewell, we wont be fighting other peoples wars
crime will drop as the culture changes to respect the elderly, and work hard for your final reward.
does this sound ok ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
